Page 2 Democracy and Patriotism Essay.
Even though WikipediA has more information than most dictionary's on patriotism, there is nothing contained therein that vividly describes true patriotism. In fact, their statement that is not in any way associated with true patriotism. The United States has a population of over three hundred million individuals and I dare say that only a very small percentage of those people are true American patriots. If we look at our Congress and even our nation's Presidency, it's also safe to state that only a very few, probably less than I can count on one hand, would qualify as true American patriots. (Sadly, some of them would better be described as enemies of the state.)
Essay on Patriotism in English For Class 10 9
I have written this brief essay in an attempt to start a dialogue on what "the people" believe is true patriotism and how we can again become a nation of patriots that respect and honor our Constitution and the Bill of Rights. That said, we have to remember that being a patriot is more than rhetoric or even writing out your thoughts for others to read. There's also one more thought for all to consider; just because someone professes to be a patriot doesn't mean that it's true. It's also a fact that just because someone enlists in the armed forces does not necessarily mean that they are a patriot, especially knowing that thousands of the unemployed are enlisting because they have no other means of supporting their families. Going to war for profit does not embody true patriotism.
This argument conflates the issue of patriotism with that of , and the notion of a patriot with that of a citizen. Unlike informalcooperation among tenants in a building, for instance, cooperation onthe scale of a country is regulated by a set of laws. To doone’s part within such a cooperative enterprise is just to obeythe laws, to act as a citizen. Whether we have a moral duty to obeythe laws of our country is one of the central issues in modernpolitical philosophy, discussed under the heading of politicalobligation. One major account of political obligation is that offairness. If successful, that account shows that we do have a moralduty to abide by the laws of our country, to act as citizens, and thatthis duty is one of fairness. To fail to abide by one’scountry’s laws is to fail to reciprocate, to take advantage ofcompatriots, to act unfairly towards them. But whereas a patriot isalso a citizen, a citizen is not necessarily a patriot. Patriotisminvolves special concern for the patria andcompatriots, a concern that goes beyond what the lawsobligate one to do, beyond what one does as a citizen; thatis, beyond what one ought, in fairness, to do. Failing toshow that concern, however, cannot be unfair – excepton the question-begging assumption that, in addition to state law,cooperation on this scale is also based on, and regulated by, a moralrule enjoining special concern for the well-being of the country andcompatriots. Dagger asserts that the claim our compatriots have on us“extends to include” such concern, but provides noargument in support of this extension.
Short Essay on Patriotism - Important India
The first being the "communitarian patriot", where patriotism is not only a valued virtue to someone's self but that it is actually an essential virtue.
The future of the country depends on its rulers
Jensen defines patriotism in his talk delivered to the Peace Action National Congress as “love and loyal or zealous support of one’s own country.” (Jensen 741) But, that is not the only definition of patriotism.
Patriotism is an attachment to a homeland
George Orwell contrasted the two in terms of aggressive vs. defensiveattitudes. Nationalism is about power: its adherent wants to acquireas much power and prestige as possible for his nation, in which hesubmerges his individuality. While nationalism is accordinglyaggressive, patriotism is defensive: it is a devotion to a particularplace and a way of life one thinks best, but has no wish to impose onothers (Orwell 1968, 362). This way of distinguishing the twoattitudes comes close to an approach popular among politicians andwidespread in everyday discourse that indicates a double standard ofthe form “us vs. them.” Country and nation are first runtogether, and then patriotism and nationalism are distinguished interms of the strength of the love and special concern one feels forit, the degree of one’s identification with it. When these areexhibited in a reasonable degree and without ill thoughts about othersand hostile actions towards them, that is patriotism; when they becomeunbridled and cause one to think ill of others and act badly towardsthem, that is nationalism. Conveniently enough, it usually turns outthat we are patriots, while they are nationalists(see Billig 1995, 55–59).
George Orwell: "Notes on Nationalism" - Resort
The benefits one has received from her country might be consideredrelevant to the duty of patriotism in a different way: as raising theissue of fairness. One’s country is not a landinhabited by strangers to whom we owe nothing beyond what we owe toany other human being. It is rather a common enterprise that producesand distributes a wide range of benefits. These benefits are madepossible by cooperation of those who live in the country, participatein the enterprise, owe and render allegiance to the polity. The rulesthat regulate the cooperation and determine the distribution ofburdens and benefits enjoin, among other things, special concern forthe well-being of compatriots which is not due to outsiders. AsRichard Dagger puts it: