Unfortunately, Embryonic Stem Cell Research has a dark side.

First of all you need to know there are three main categories of stem cells.

Debates have exploded over every aspect of stem cell research.

There was an interesting flare-up. UCI is professional home to Dr. Hans Keirstead, co-director of the . According to , Keirstead is spearheading the first FDA approved human trial of injecting embryonic stem cells into spinal-cord patients.

Embryonic stem cell research requires the destruction of a human embryo.

The discoveries of embryonic stem, ES, cells in 1998 by James A.

The main argument against ES cell research is that embryos should never be destroyed based on the principle of respect for life. Upon conception embryos are alive and have the unequivocal right to maintain that life. Whether one is using “left-over” IVF embryos ready to be discarded or the fetal tissue remains from elective abortions, any intentional destruction of an embryo cannot be justified. In effect, those arguing against ES cell research are saying that embryos have the moral status of persons and so should not be killed regardless of the extent of human benefit. As Richard Salzman says, “some diseases are better than the cure.” There is some truth in that statement. But even for objectors to ES cell research it does seem that closely held values are at times over-ridden in the name of other closely held values. As regards valuing life, we certainly risk life in the pursuit of ending human rights atrocities. So the question is how much truth is there in Salzman’s statement and how does this notion relate to the question of the limits on ES cell research.

Suggestive of this metaphor (commences) a very similar issue: Embryonic Stem Cell Research.

Many view the issue of stem cell research and stem cell therapy as morally wrong and a crime against humanity, others view the study of stem cells as the next step in modern science.

Two types of these tiny cells are adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells....


Stem cell research is a very controversial, yet promising study.

Bothwell, Laura. “Federal Funds Should Be Used for Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” Stem Cells. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from “Judge Lamberth’s Unspoken Morality.” The Hastings Center. 2010. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 15 Apr. 2013.

Stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they can be converted into other.

Keiper, Adam, and Yuval Levin. “Federal Funds Should Not Be Used for Research That Destroys Embryos.” Stem Cells. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from “Stem Cells, Life, and the Law.”National Review (25 Aug. 2010). Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 15 Apr. 2013.

1998 marked the first removal of a human embryonic stem cell.

Waskey, Andrew J. “Moral Status of Embryo.” Encyclopedia of Stem Cell Research. Ed. Clive N. Svendsen, and Allison D. Ebert. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2008. 347-52. SAGE knowledge. Web. 15 Apr. 2013.

Opposing Embryonic Stem Cell Research Essays

In July 2006, (former) President George W. Bush vetoed a bill to ensure the continuation and expansion of human embryonic stem (hES) cell research in the USA; including the proposition to allow discarded embryos created for IVF to be utilized as sources for new hES cell lines.

Essay on Opposing Embryonic Stem Cell Research - …

A group of plaintiffs filed a federal lawsuit today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to "enjoin and overturn the controversial guidelines for public funding of embryonic stem cell research that the National Institutes of Health issued on July 7, 2009," according to a ....