Romeo and Juliet, Baz Luhrmann Essay - 1944 Words

In this essay, I will include many different reasons as to why Romeo and Juliet die.

Ep. 4: Romeo and Juliet on film - Luhrmann vs Zeffirelli

Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet is a visually stunning, experimental gem in the world of Shakespeare interpretations, but it lacks the emotional resonance of other interpretations and feels too glitzy and shallow. Its only saving grace is Shakespeare’s centuries old text, the solid performance by its leads, and one or two decent performances amongst the supporting cast. Otherwise, this brand new Blu-ray release is still quite enjoyable to watch and offers a fine home theatre experience, I’d just recommend renting this one rather than purchasing it.

In this essay I’m going to discuss how Shakespeare builds the tension ‘Romeo and Juliet’, specifically concentrating on act 3 scenes 1.

No Fear Shakespeare: Romeo and Juliet

But, Luhrmann still gains points for style and originality in this re-working of Romeo and Juliet. Removing the play from Italy and setting in L.A., the tragic story of Shakespeare’s young star-crossed lovers takes on a colorful, ultra-modern twist dressed up in blazing primary colors with a contemporary soundtrack and frenetic visual effects.

If you stuck Shakespeare in a pop-culture blender and hit "puree," you'd probably end up with Baz Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet

Answer: The two version of ‘Romeo and Juliet’ that we watched were the 1968 Franco Zeffirelli version, staring Leonard Whiting, and Olivia Hussy, and the 1996 Baz Luhrmann version, staring Clair Danes, and Leonardo De Caprio.

Category: Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet; Title: Romeo and Juliet Movie versus Play