The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new.
When particular gun control laws are before the Supreme Court for eitherstatutory or constitutional interpretation, Justice Stevens is a reliable voteto uphold the law in question, often with language detailing the harm of gunviolence. ] It is notable, then, that Justice Stevens recognizes a right to bear armsas an important constitutional right, whose deprivation should not be shieldedfrom judicial review.
Gun-control laws should support both sides of the debate.
First, know your facts before ever writing down the first word of your gun control essay. Maybe you have taken a side, or perhaps you have not yet weighed in on the gun control issue. But instead of taking your feelings and writing them down into a gun control essay, take a step back and research the facts. There are tons of them available online both through independent research agencies and through associations that are tied in with the federal government, so do your research first and then start formulating your essay.
While gun control statistics, and merely the fact that guns are used in so many violent crimes, makes it easy to point fingers, the problem is not that simple.
Personally, I am pro gun control.
Dissenting, Justice Stephen Field (perhaps the strongest civil libertiesadvocate on the Court during the nineteenth century) contended that the"infamy and disgrace" which might result from the testimony wasjustification enough not to testify, even if there could be no criminalprosecution. Justice Field's opinion carefully analyzed English and early American precedent,reflecting Field's vivid appreciation of the long Anglo-American struggle forliberty against arbitrary government. Law and order was less important than Constitutional law, he continued, for theclaim that "the proof of offenses like those prescribed by the interstatecommerce act will be difficult and probably impossible, ought not to have afeather's weight against the abuses which would follow necessarily theenforcement of incriminating testimony." All Constitutional rights ought to be liberally construed,for:
Gun control statistics can provide useful insights into this issue.
Despite the passion that some feel for gun control, it is highly unlikely that they will ever be given up by those that love and use them.
Free gun control debate Essays and Papers
The law is perfectly well settled that the first ten Amendments to theconstitution, commonly known as the Bill of Rights, were not intended to laydown any novel principles of government, but simply to embody certain guaranteesand immunities which we had inherited from our English ancestors, and which fromtime immemorial had been subject to certain well-recognized exceptions arisingfrom the necessities of the case. In incorporating these principles into thefundamental law, there was no intention of disregarding the exceptions, whichcontinued to be recognized as if they had been formally expressed. Thus, thefreedom of speech and of the press (article 1) does not permit the publicationof libels, blasphemous or indecent articles, or other publications injurious topublic morals or private reputation; the right of the people to keep and beararms (article 2) is not infringed by law prohibiting the carrying of concealedweapons; the provision that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy (art. 5)does not prevent a second trial, if upon the first trial the jury failed toagree, or the verdict was set aside upon the defendant's motion. . . . Likewise, the self-incrimination clause did not bar a person from beingcompelled to testify against himself if he were immune from prosecution; and theconfrontation clause did not bar the admission of dying declarations.
Free gun control debate papers, essays, and research papers.
On the other side of the debate, the critical wounding of James Brady gave gun control advocates a visible martyr with strong ties to Republican conservatives.