It’s the jacket and tie — in public school.
The Brazilian government has also tried to facilitate access of poor students to public universities through sweeping policy changes for federal universities. In 2012, the Senate passed a law that required federal universities to follow admissions quotas. Half of all spaces in the federal universities are to be reserved for applicants who graduated from public high schools. A quarter of spaces must be allocated to applicants who come from families with low incomes. The racial composition of the students in the universities must reflect the racial composition of the state where the university is located. Some state universities have also decided to follow the federal guidelines on quotas. This contrasts to U.S. policies, in which universities have moved away from giving preferences to applicants on the basis of race.
Structural inequality in education - Wikipedia
Mandatory education for Indian children became law in 1893 and thereafter agents on the reservations received instructions on how to enforce the federal regulation. If parents refused to send their children to school the authorities could withhold annuities or rations or send them to jail. Some parents were uncomfortable having their children sent far away from home. The educators had quotas to fill, however, and considerable pressure was exerted on Indian families to send their youngsters to boarding schools beginning when the child was six years old. Fear and loneliness caused by this early separation from family is a common experience shared by all former students. Once their children were enrolled in a distant school, parents lost control over decisions that affected them. For example, requests for holiday leave could be denied by the superintendent for almost any reason. ()
Uniforms present an affordable clothing option, particularly for low-income families. Chains from Walmart and Target to The Children’s Place and Land’s End all offer standard uniforms at varying price points. In 2008, Target became the for public elementary schools in Chicago, selling uniforms at a discount on a coupon system and providing free uniforms for several thousand homeless children within CPS.
Term Paper and Essay on INEQUALITY AND EDUCATION.
It would take another 150 years or so before widespread use of uniforms in American public schools would be on the table, but the backstory there is not to be overlooked either. Brunsma goes on to lay out a concise timeline of the American school uniform policy in public education, from idea to implementation.
Essay- Equality in Education | catherine tromp
Whether intentionally or not, private school uniforms denote socioeconomic status, just as standard public school uniforms — i.e., plain polos and pants — do. More students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch (the gauge for poverty among school-aged kids) , which means that uniformed public schoolers tend to be poorer than their non-uniformed counterparts. In Chicago, 81 percent of schools with uniform policies hold student populations that are over 80 percent low income, and 80 percent hold student populations that are over 80 percent black or Hispanic.
Race and Social Inequality in Education
Second, democracy may lead to “Inequality-Increasing Market Opportunities”. Nondemocracy may exclude a large fraction of the population from productive occupations, for example from skilled occupations and entrepreneurship, as starkly illustrated by Apartheid South Africa or perhaps also by the former Soviet Union. To the extent that there is significant heterogeneity within this population, the freedom to take part in economic activities on a more level playing field with the previous elite may actually increase inequality within the excluded or repressed group and consequently within the entire society.
Economic Inequality Essay | Bartleby
First, growing inequality is the flip side of something else: shrinking opportunity. Whenever we diminish equality of opportunity, it means that we are not using some of our most valuable assets—our people—in the most productive way possible. Second, many of the distortions that lead to inequality—such as those associated with monopoly power and preferential tax treatment for special interests—undermine the efficiency of the economy. This new inequality goes on to create new distortions, undermining efficiency even further. To give just one example, far too many of our most talented young people, seeing the astronomical rewards, have gone into finance rather than into fields that would lead to a more productive and healthy economy.