Essay On The Development Of Christian Doctrine
Yet we can see The Truth still living on when we study history and the development of Christian Doctrine. We see the early Church Fathers showing their reliance on both Scripture and Tradition. Sola Scriptura would be a novel doctrine even to them if their actions are anything to go by. Their reliance on Tradition in conjunction with the Scriptures they had available to them, or those they believed to be Scripture such as the Didache, instead of gathering up all the Scriptures to ensure they were teaching only from Scripture shows that either they didn’t care about Scripture or there is more than just the Scriptures that a Christian needs to follow in relation to God’s Word. The first example makes no sense since they often quoted Scripture at length to make their case however, during the Arian heresy, Scripture alone was not sufficient which is where homoousion came into play. The second example makes much more sense and is supported with a plethora of Scripture.
An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine : …
John Henry Cardinal Newman should be named a saint if only for his . All joking aside this book was eye opening. If anyone wants to understand fully how Christian Doctrine has developed over time you need to read the book. This article is not to be confused as a review or summary of the book but a short explanation.
Also, I suggest that in the context of this essay'sdiscussion of Matthew 25, we can put aside the doctrinal/theological disputesbetween the Roman Catholic Church and other Christian denominations. The Pope'sanalysis of Matthew 25 can and should be used as a benchmark by all Christiansto understand what Matthew 25 requires of those who seek to follow theteachings of Jesus. As to the relevancy of Matthew 25 to non-Christians, see .